User talk:Apers0n
A magazine reporter working on an upcoming article would like to speak with one or more dedicated SNPedia contributors. We appreciate your involvement and would like to personally invite you to consider speaking to this writer. If you might be willing, or have questions about this, let us know by email (info@snpedia.com) – thanks. Greg (talk) 03:30, 21 August 2014 (UTC)Greg
thanks for your edits. A bot will fill in chromosome, position and many other fields in the next 24h. --- cariaso 17:58, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Your edit of rs11234027 doesn't make any sense to me. Please explain or refrain from adding snps unless there is some information you can add. --- cariaso 14:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Needs to reference http://hmg.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2010/05/07/hmg.ddq155.full.pdf -- Jlick (talk) 15:17, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Apologies, I thought the refs were added automatically, now done. Apers0n (talk) 15:58, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
re: rs507879 "Please explain or refrain from adding snps unless there is some information you can add." FAQ "It would be possible to load all ~10M SNPs from dbSNP, but then the only thing we could say about 99.99% of them would be 'this is a SNP' and perhaps which microarrays it occurs on. Few people would care." --- cariaso 20:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- I didn't have time to add any info to rs507879 but was going to later, User:Jlick has added some PMID links (thanks), the page should be more useful to readers now. Apers0n (talk) 20:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- I've reverted your edit of rs17367504(A;A). Why do you claim it's good? --- cariaso 20:03, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
